Ezekiel’s Prophecy of the Temple Essay

Ezekiel 40-48 Presentation The Temple  â â â â â â â â â â The prediction of the sanctuary should be deciphered actually and not metaphorically. This is on the grounds that it was given when Ezekiel was still in bondage. Since Ezekiel was in bondage while expressing this prediction, this time was exacting and not allegorical. Likewise, Ezekiel’s prophetically calamitous predictions will in general have close similitudes with predictions found in the disclosures, which is another recommendation that the prescience is more exacting than metaphorical. In Ezekiel 40-42, Ezekiel depicts a sanctuary that will be built and would be utilized for loving for the Israelites as well as the whole world. Since the sanctuary being depicted has never been built, it becomes obvious that the prediction is yet to be satisfied.  â â â â â â â â â â In early parts of Ezekiel 40, the prophet talks of being taken to Jerusalem in a dream. It is in this vision that he is indicated another sanctuary. The motivation behind why the prediction is more strict than allegorical is on the grounds that most predictions are liberal. For example, a similar way God demonstrated Ezekiel a genuine sanctuary, a comparable sanctuary was appeared to David, which was later on to be worked by Solomon in Jerusalem when he was best. Consequently, as I would see it, the sanctuary that God indicated Ezekiel will likewise be worked in Jerusalem.  â â â â â â â â â â The other motivation behind why Ezekiel’s prediction was more exacting than metaphorical is because of the subtleties shrouded in the parts. Estimations of the sanctuary dividers just as patios and doors cause the vision to show up increasingly exacting. Despite the fact that this vision is yet to be satisfied, the bookâ of disclosures expresses that there will be no sanctuary developed in the New Jerusalem since it is God and the sheep that will speak to the sanctuary. Because of this disclosure, it is obvious that the prediction is strict since no sanctuary will be developed. Creature Sacrifices  â â â â â â â â â â In Ezekiel 44-46, Ezekiel discusses penances that will be offered in the new sanctuary. This prescience is additionally exacting since it is hard to accept that penances will appear again later on. As I would like to think, this prediction is exacting since rather than penances, the vision portrays remembrance penances like those that happened during the principal happening to Jesus Christ, for example, the last dinner. During the last dinner, Jesus requested that his supporters use bread and wine in his remembrance. This suggested God inclines toward this type of remembrance as opposed to the ordinary penance.  â â â â â â â â â â In my conclusion, the penance envisioned in the sanctuary by Ezekiel is more strict than emblematic since it speaks to the nearness of Jesus as opposed to the exacting creature penance. Through this, it is obvious that the sanctuary envisioned by Ezekiel will be satisfied by Jesus’ second coming. In Ezekiel 45-46, he discusses a sovereign who will complete his jobs with equity and uprightness. For example, with regards to burden, this sovereign will guarantee that he takes just what one can bear, this is comparable to one’s monetary capacity. Because of this disclosure, it becomes apparent that the prediction should be comprehended as strict and not metaphorical. References La Sor, William Sanford, David Allan Hubbard, Frederic William Bush, and Leslie C. Allen. Old Testament Survey: The Message, Form and Background of the Old Testament. Great Rapids, Mich: W.B. Eerdmans, 1996. Value, Randall. â€Å"Ezekiel’s Prophecy of the Temple.† World of the Bible. n.d. Accessible at http://www.worldofthebible.com/Bible%20Studies/Ezekiel%27s%20Prophecy%20of%20the%20Temple.pdf â€Å"Reflections on the First Testament.† 2009. Accessible at http://garyeyates.blogspot.com/2009/12/sanctuary in-new-confirmation html. Source record